<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Typo is an Island</title>
	<link>http://www.greattypohunt.com/teal/blog/?p=30</link>
	<description>The Typo Eradication Advancement League (TEAL) hits the road.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Drier Operators and the rest of the world &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8216;drier operator&#8217; on the web</title>
		<link>http://www.greattypohunt.com/teal/blog/?p=30#comment-1513</link>
		<dc:creator>Drier Operators and the rest of the world &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8216;drier operator&#8217; on the web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.greattypohunt.com/teal/blog/?p=30#comment-1513</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.jeffdeck.com/teal/blog/?p=30The land became flatter and drier as we approached the Texas border. We stopped soon after crossing and ate at a Waffle House, where we contemplated changing our Houston-bound NUMB3RS dvd plans after hearing a hostel clerk’s warning about the &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] <a href="http://www.jeffdeck.com/teal/blog/?p=30The" rel="nofollow">http://www.jeffdeck.com/teal/blog/?p=30The</a> land became flatter and drier as we approached the Texas border. We stopped soon after crossing and ate at a Waffle House, where we contemplated changing our Houston-bound NUMB3RS dvd plans after hearing a hostel clerk’s warning about the &#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hicks</title>
		<link>http://www.greattypohunt.com/teal/blog/?p=30#comment-789</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.greattypohunt.com/teal/blog/?p=30#comment-789</guid>
		<description>"to truly understand. But let’s"   Starting a sentence with a conjunction. Can we start a correct grammar blog? Maybe work your way back, from west to east.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;to truly understand. But let’s&#8221;   Starting a sentence with a conjunction. Can we start a correct grammar blog? Maybe work your way back, from west to east.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cletus</title>
		<link>http://www.greattypohunt.com/teal/blog/?p=30#comment-777</link>
		<dc:creator>Cletus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.greattypohunt.com/teal/blog/?p=30#comment-777</guid>
		<description>Associated Press Stylebook says – you need to go back to Galveston and remove the superlative S. The apostrophe is correct, but the extra S is…extra.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Associated Press Stylebook says – you need to go back to Galveston and remove the superlative S. The apostrophe is correct, but the extra S is…extra.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seabiscute</title>
		<link>http://www.greattypohunt.com/teal/blog/?p=30#comment-737</link>
		<dc:creator>Seabiscute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.greattypohunt.com/teal/blog/?p=30#comment-737</guid>
		<description>Having had occasion just last night to look up the rule about possessives and proper names ending in S -- which actually was out of curiosity about our interim minister's habit of saying "Jesuses," and that particular issue I did not resolve -- I can state with confidence that AP style does not put the extra S on anybody, Biblical or contemporary.  I think you could have saved the Wite-Out on Davy's name.  

On the other hand, someone stole (borrowed but did not return) my Chicago Manual, so I am limited in reference to the AP Stylebook.

I originally came to Comments to point out the "go-goes" thing -- I am glad that was not needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having had occasion just last night to look up the rule about possessives and proper names ending in S &#8212; which actually was out of curiosity about our interim minister&#8217;s habit of saying &#8220;Jesuses,&#8221; and that particular issue I did not resolve &#8212; I can state with confidence that AP style does not put the extra S on anybody, Biblical or contemporary.  I think you could have saved the Wite-Out on Davy&#8217;s name.  </p>
<p>On the other hand, someone stole (borrowed but did not return) my Chicago Manual, so I am limited in reference to the AP Stylebook.</p>
<p>I originally came to Comments to point out the &#8220;go-goes&#8221; thing &#8212; I am glad that was not needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lex</title>
		<link>http://www.greattypohunt.com/teal/blog/?p=30#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 05:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.greattypohunt.com/teal/blog/?p=30#comment-701</guid>
		<description>Names of Biblical figures aren't the only ones without an 's' after the apostrophe - the rule also applies to mythical figures (such as Achilles or Hercules). Davy Jones could arguably fit into this category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Names of Biblical figures aren&#8217;t the only ones without an &#8217;s&#8217; after the apostrophe - the rule also applies to mythical figures (such as Achilles or Hercules). Davy Jones could arguably fit into this category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveK</title>
		<link>http://www.greattypohunt.com/teal/blog/?p=30#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 16:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.greattypohunt.com/teal/blog/?p=30#comment-633</guid>
		<description>Pieter, I've never heard it pronounced Joneses -- Jones' is both the correct construction and pronunciation in common use.
 -- Dave K.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pieter, I&#8217;ve never heard it pronounced Joneses &#8212; Jones&#8217; is both the correct construction and pronunciation in common use.<br />
 &#8212; Dave K.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://www.greattypohunt.com/teal/blog/?p=30#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.greattypohunt.com/teal/blog/?p=30#comment-550</guid>
		<description>Like Going Coastal, I lament that I am probably too late to suggest a return to the beach renourishment sign. How could you leave "go" untouched? *sob*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Going Coastal, I lament that I am probably too late to suggest a return to the beach renourishment sign. How could you leave &#8220;go&#8221; untouched? *sob*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pieter</title>
		<link>http://www.greattypohunt.com/teal/blog/?p=30#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Pieter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 15:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.greattypohunt.com/teal/blog/?p=30#comment-454</guid>
		<description>The extra s in Jones's is pronounced when it is not there, that is what the plain apostophe does. I'm sure the Globe used it because it is the season for liberals to fight. Jones' is pronounced joneses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The extra s in Jones&#8217;s is pronounced when it is not there, that is what the plain apostophe does. I&#8217;m sure the Globe used it because it is the season for liberals to fight. Jones&#8217; is pronounced joneses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.greattypohunt.com/teal/blog/?p=30#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.greattypohunt.com/teal/blog/?p=30#comment-450</guid>
		<description>Actually, Alyssa, your link proves them correct. Most of that page discusses pluralizing a noun ending in 's', but if you scroll down, you'll see an example of a possessive singular noun ending in 's'.

PS improper use of ellipses. el oh el</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Alyssa, your link proves them correct. Most of that page discusses pluralizing a noun ending in &#8217;s&#8217;, but if you scroll down, you&#8217;ll see an example of a possessive singular noun ending in &#8217;s&#8217;.</p>
<p>PS improper use of ellipses. el oh el</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alyssa</title>
		<link>http://www.greattypohunt.com/teal/blog/?p=30#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>Alyssa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 13:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.greattypohunt.com/teal/blog/?p=30#comment-426</guid>
		<description>Love what you're doing, but the extra "s" on Jones is making me itchy.  Jones' yes...Jones's no.  I think this confirms it? http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/90/5/708

Really though...great job overall.  I hate finding typos.  Hate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love what you&#8217;re doing, but the extra &#8220;s&#8221; on Jones is making me itchy.  Jones&#8217; yes&#8230;Jones&#8217;s no.  I think this confirms it? <a href="http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/90/5/708" rel="nofollow">http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/90/5/708</a></p>
<p>Really though&#8230;great job overall.  I hate finding typos.  Hate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
